![]() |
![]() |
||
| CONTENTS | |||
|
|||
| 1. Super sizing local boards | |||
| 2. Balancing roles, communities and constraints | |||
If you wish to contact the AUT Local Government Centre directly with your queries or comments, click here. |
|||
| EDITORIAL | |||
|
Local Government Commission Proposals This special edition of Local Matters has been prepared to help readers who may be thinking of making a submission to the Local Government Commission on its proposals for the constitution of local boards. Local boards are going to be one of the most important elements of Auckland's new governance structure. Getting the mix right is a challenging task, especially given the statutory constraints under which the Commission is working. It has produced a series of proposals which, within their own framework, are consistent and well argued. They are not, however, the only possible outcome from the task which the Commission was given. In the first of two articles Peter McKinlay considers whether the Commission's proposals are likely to meet the widely expressed demand, both in submissions to the Royal Commission, and to the select committee, that the new arrangements for Auckland should put the 'local' back into local government. In the second article, Catherine Harland, the Centre's research officer, draws on her long experience as an elected member in Auckland local government to reflect on the commission's proposals, including how they relate to the communities of interest she has observed over her time as an elected member. Both articles are a contribution to the public debate over the future structure of Auckland's local governance. The Local Government Centre hopes that they encourage people to become engaged, and make their views known to the Local Government Commission. |
||
Super sizing local boards
|
Friday 20th of November gave Aucklanders two different visions of the nature of local boards and the communities they will serve. The Minister of Social Development, Paula Bennett, in her speech to the Passing Go Conference presented an intimate village style view of the type of community which the typical local board might serve:
It's a view about scale; of local board areas being small enough that the board's elected members will have an intimate understanding of their communities’ needs and aspirations. At the same time the Local Government Commission was presenting its vision of local boards. Leaving aside the two small boards they were required by statute to establish (Waiheke and Great Barrier), the Commission proposes 17 local boards. Two of these are essentially based on the single wards which the Commission is required to establish for the rural part of Rodney district, and that part of Franklin district coming within the Auckland Council area respectively. Those can be seen as special cases in considering the Commission's overall proposal. To do that we concentrate on the 15 local boards proposed for the balance of the Auckland region. Read more. . . (5 page pdf 356kb) |
||
Balancing roles, communities and constraints
|
Prior to the nationwide reforms to local government in 1989 there were 23 boroughs and cities and 21 ad hoc bodies within the Auckland region. At the time of the amalgamation into 7 territorial authorities and the Auckland Regional Council, there were substantial concerns expressed about the change and the ‘loss of local democracy and community identity’ that would result. A few local boroughs bitterly fought the changes and for some in the community today, the pre-1989 period is reflected on as a far better time when ‘you could easily identify and chat to your local councillors and personally know the Mayor’. So 20 years on, what are some of the impacts arising from the Local Government Commission’s proposed changes from 262 elected members to 147 elected members. A substantive change in focus and step-up in roles Read more. . . (6 page pdf 388kb) |
||